Londontowndating com upscaledating com
From time to time they may actually write something useful and informative. ]It's not true that killed stories can't be seen by anyone except the submitter.Would summarizing it with a link to the original be an acceptable post? I don't have a lot of popular blogs like CH in my feed reader, but I rely on others to let me know when Jeff writes something I would find interesting. They can be seen by everyone else who has showdead turned on.* Add a mandatory preview button for posts and comments.Hi swombat, Regarding gawker, as I remember, there was a discussion here whether to ban it, and most people were for the ban.I did want to browse some of these sites just to see why they might be banned (mapsofindia.com? How is it "abnormal" to keep the same hierarchy as the main hierarchy?) and it's a nuisance to have to copy and paste URLs so I parsed that list into one with link tags and put it here: thought the same at first, but is Argentina doing something abnormal with ar and ar? The countries that mix everything like tend to lose some vital functionality.However, editor-oversight of this list and, more broadly, this site has drawbacks: sustainability, non-diversity, missed opportunity.There are many news stories that are absolute tripe by our standards and yet yield good discussions, distinctions, related works, and counterpoints.
It might be a detailed criticism for the author or submitter, an explanation of phenomenon, or a link to a better blog-post on the same issue.The problem isnt that our ethic is absent there, but that it's drowned out.Build up a public system alongside editor intervention.There's been a few cases recently where I found an interesting article to submit here and was unable to submit it.The site appears to accept the article, but the story remains invisible to everyone and to me appears to have no comment box.